What is the meaning of elucidating


In contrast to some humanistic qualitative researchers who rely upon the claims of science to affirm their study’s validity, critical researchers distance themselves from methodologies that are imported from the natural sciences.Qualitative research that emerges from a critical tradition, therefore, often encounters from its audience less perceived need to argue for a study’s validity using terms imposed from logical positivism.With its proponents’ commitment to the idea that research can bring about a better and more equitable world, critics charge that critical theorists tend to assume that they are not only more capable of analyzing a situation than most; they are better equipped to offer a proscriptive plan of action.Critics charge that this often brings theorists outside of their realms of expertise so that the insights they offer are naive and unworkable in the contemporary setting.Critical Theory and Constructivism: Theory and Methods for the Teens and the New Media @ Home Project by Lynn Schofield Clark, Ph. Introduction: It is our belief that there is no single methodology that is superior to any other methodology in every case; different research questions lend themselves to different methodologies.



Among these scholars, Anthony Giddens and Jurgen Habermas are two who have been particularly influential in the current project.In media studies, scholars employing a Critical approach include persons such as Andrew Calabrese, Janice Peck, John Durham Peters, Hanno Hardt, Todd Gitlin, Douglas Kellner, Kevin Robins, Slavko Splichal, Thomas Streeter, Dan Schiller, Janet Wasko, and others.While early research in this tradition focused on class oppression, more recent works have argued that focusing only on one form of oppression (class vs.Critical theorists hold that these earlier approaches offered no ability to explain social change.